Personality and negotiation style: The moderating effects of cultural context

LGMT 236 – 6.4 Literature Review Rubric LGMT 236 – 6.4 Literature Review Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 20.0 pts Excellent (A) 18 – 20 Points: Organization of the important issues and/ or arguments is excellent. Formulation of ideas and concepts are easy to read and comprehend. Line of thought is illustrated and clearly supported with excellent examples. 17.0 pts Satisfactory (B) 16 – 17 Points: Organization of the important issues and/ or arguments is proficient. Formulation of ideas and concepts are reasonably easy to comprehend. Line of thought is supported with relevant examples. 15.0 pts Passing (C) 14 – 15 Points: Organization of the important issues and/ or arguments is limited. Formulation of ideas and concepts are somewhat comprehensible. Line of thought is supported with some relevant examples. 13.0 pts Failing (F) 0 – 13 Points: Organization of issues and/ or arguments is non- existent. Formulation of ideas and concepts are incomprehensible. Line of thought is not supported. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique/ Reflection 20.0 pts Excellent (A) 18 – 20 Points: Literature is well critiqued and evaluated. 17.0 pts Satisfactory (B) 16 – 17 Points: Review presents a good critique of the literature. 15.0 pts Passing (C) 14 – 15 Points: Critique of the literature is fair. 13.0 pts Failing (F) 0 – 13 Points: Critique of the literature is poor. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Number and Quality of Sources 15.0 pts Excellent (A) 14 – 15 Points: More than the required number of peer reviewed sources used. 13.0 pts Satisfactory (B) 12 – 13 Points: Required number of peer reviewed sources used. 11.0 pts Passing (C) 10 – 11 Points: Meets the required number of sources but not all sources are peer reviewed. 9.0 pts Failing (F) 0 – 9 Points: Uses less than the required number of sources. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary 15.0 pts Excellent (A) 14 – 15 Points: All relevant literature summarized. 13.0 pts Satisfactory (B) 12 – 13 Points: Most relevant literature summarized. 11.0 pts Passing (C) 10 – 11 Points: Some relevant literature summarized. 9.0 pts Failing (F) 0 – 9 Points: Little to no relevant literature. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style & Mechanics 15.0 pts Excellent (A) 14 – 15 Points: Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 13.0 pts Satisfactory (B) 12 – 13 Points: Uses words accurately and effectively but may be too general. Sentences are for the most part clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors which may annoy the reader but does not impede understanding. 11.0 pts Passing (C) 10 – 11 Points: Uses relatively vague and general words and may use some inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure is generally correct but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede overall understanding. 9.0 pts Failing (F) 0 – 9 Points: Misuse of words and awkward sentences throughout. Contains many errors in spelling, grammar, and/ or punctuation.