Rhetorical Analysis on Marshall’s “Understand Faulty Thinking to Tackle Climate Change”

Description

For your second major paper in this course, you will analyze the rhetorical appeals of a writer and evaluate the effectiveness of those appeals. The instructions for this assignment appear on pp. xxiv-xxxi in Everything’s an Argument. Please note that you should your Rhetorical Analysis on either Marshall’s “Understand Faulty Thinking to Tackle Climate Change” or Ngai’s “Reforming Immigration for Good.” Write on only one article. Page requirement: The first RAE submission must be 3 full pages. The final RAE submission must be a minimum of 4 FULL pages / 1000-1250 words (not 31/2 or 31/4) to a maximum of 5 pages. All major papers must be formatted in MLA style