Principles of assessment and progression in geography.

:The assignment is promising – there is careful literature use and clarity of understanding the key principles of assessment and progression in geography. I like the very clear title Q. • You need to develop a stronger narrative about what you are trying to do, here. What is your argument (both from the literature review, and from the findings)? At present, it is written as reporting the literature, reporting about the school, reporting the lessons….you need to add YOUR analysis to this, what can you say, in each section, that draws out an important message for the reader? • Linked to this point, can you connect the parts of the literature review (by developing your argument) – e.g. p1 (powerful knowledge of geography) and p2 (GA’s criteria for progression in geography). Don’t leave it to the reader to work out how they connect, but explain for them. • Show that you recognise different perspectives – such as different viewpoints on what assessment is for, what progress in geography looks like, even what counts as ‘knowledge’ – this gives your work more criticality. • Before going into methodology, state your research Q/Qs – the title may be the overarching Q, but are there subsidiary Qs which are guiding your case study – telling you (and the reader) what you are aiming to do by the case study. • The table p 7-8 will be clearer if you give a heading to each of the columns.I too personally believe my English needs to be looked up as I may have done grammar mistakes. As the research has already been carried out, it need to be written in past tense and second person.