Personal Leadership Evaluation

Assignments needs to be APA DCM1 — DCM Task 1: Personal Leadership Evaluation Managing Organizations and Leading People — C200 Performance Assessment — DCM1 Task OverviewSubmissionsScore Reports · Competencies · Introduction · Requirements · Rubric Competencies 3018.1.2Theories of Leadership The graduate uses contemporary theories of leadership to develop personal leadership skills based on a personal leadership philosophy. Introduction For this task, you will conduct an evaluation of your personal leadership effectiveness. You will write a paper evaluating your own leadership using a scholarly leadership theory. To help you refine your own leadership skills, you will develop at least two SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound) goals as part of your evaluation. Scenario Requirements Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Write a paper (suggested length of 6–10 pages) by doing the following: A. Provide a PDF copy of your “Signature Themes” report after completing the CliftonStrengths assessment. 1. Reflect on the results of the five categorical strengths from your CliftonStrengths assessment, including what those results might indicate about your leadership. B. Evaluate your leadership, using one of the scholarly leadership theories below, by doing the following: • transformational leadership • transactional leadership • situational leadership • participative leadership • servant leadership • behavioral leadership • trait theory of leadership 1. Evaluate three strengths of your leadership, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each strength relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of your strengths with at least one scholarly source. 2. Evaluate three weaknesses of your leadership, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each weakness relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of your weaknesses with at least one scholarly source. 3. Recommend three actionable items to improve the effectiveness of your leadership, including how each actionable item relates to the chosen scholarly leadership theory. Support the recommendations of actionable items with at least one scholarly source. Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, or any source from a university faculty member or business leader. Scholarly sources also include any article or book in the online WGU library. C. Discuss two short-term goals that will help improve your leadership. Adhere to the SMART criteria for each goal: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound. 1. Discuss at least two specific actions you will take to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part C. D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. Rubric A:Signature Themes Report Not Evident A PDF copy of the “Signature Themes” report is not provided. Approaching Competence Not applicable. Competent A PDF copy of the “Signature Themes” report is provided. A1:Reflection on CliftonStrengths Not Evident A reflection on the results of the 5 categorical strengths from the CliftonStrengths assessment is not provided. Approaching Competence The reflection on the results of the 5 categorical strengths from the CliftonStrengths assessment is not supported by specific details of each strength, or it does not include what each may indicate about personal leadership. Competent The reflection on the results of the 5 categorical strengths from the CliftonStrengths assessment is supported by specific details of each strength and includes what each may indicate about personal leadership. B1:Personal Leadership Strengths Not Evident The submission does not evaluate 3 personal leadership strengths. Approaching Competence The submission evaluates 3 personal leadership strengths, but the evaluation does not use the chosen scholarly leadership theory, or it does not include specific details of each strength or specific examples to support how each strength relates to the chosen theory. Or the evaluation is not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. Competent The submission evaluates 3 personal leadership strengths using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, and the evaluation includes specific details of each strength and specific examples to support how each strength relates to the chosen theory. The evaluation is supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. B2:Personal Leadership Weaknesses Not Evident The submission does not evaluate 3 personal leadership weaknesses. Approaching Competence The submission evaluates 3 personal leadership weaknesses, but the evaluation does not use the chosen scholarly leadership theory, or it does not include specific details of each weakness or specific examples to support how each weakness relates to the chosen theory. Or the evaluation is not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. Competent The submission evaluates 3 personal leadership weaknesses using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, and the evaluation includes specific details of each weakness and specific examples to support how each weakness relates to the chosen theory. The evaluation is supported by at least 1 scholarly appropriate source. B3:Recommendations for Personal Leadership Not Evident The submission does not recommend 3 actionable items to improve personal leadership effectiveness. Approaching Competence The submission recommends 3 actionable items to improve personal leadership effectiveness, but the recommendations do not align to the chosen scholarly leadership theory or do not include specific examples to support how each actionable item relates to the chosen theory. Or the recommendations are not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. Competent The submission recommends 3 actionable items to improve personal leadership effectiveness, and the recommendations align to the chosen scholarly leadership theory and includes specific examples to support how each actionable item relates to the chosen theory. The recommendation is supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. C:SMART Goals Not Evident A discussion of 2 short-term goals that will help improve personal leadership is not provided. Approaching Competence The discussion includes 2 short-term goals that will help improve personal leadership, but the goals do not adhere to each of the SMART criteria (i.e., specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound). Competent The discussion includes 2 short-term goals that will help improve personal leadership, and the goals adhere to each of the SMART criteria (i.e., specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound). C1:Specific Actions Not Evident A discussion of at least 2 actions to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part C is not provided. Approaching Competence The discussion includes at least 2 actions to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part C, but it does not include specific details of each action. Competent The discussion includes specific details of at least 2 actions to reach each of the SMART goals discussed in part C. D:APA Sources Not Evident The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. Competent The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. E:Professional Communication

Click here to request for this assignment help