Impact of Digital Transformation in Oil & Gas Companies
Need to incorporate my mentor comments “you are lacking in at least two areas. (1) The portions you’ve written are missing the citations from the source information that gives those conclusions. Essentially, you’re writing about all sorts of conclusions to the main questions of the thesis to your study, which is fine, but you’re not providing the source of those conclusions. What led you to come to those findings? What data revealed this information to you? To simply say that “the data suggests digital technology will help Saudi Arabian oil companies” is not sufficient. You need to provide a direct reference of WHICH data gives this opinion. What you’re written so far is just an extra-long summation, but you’re missing the main point… to tie together the Problem Statement’s main concerns that generated the research questions, with the data results from your primary (or secondary) research, and make conclusions based on the evidence all of that revealed. Right now, you have done none of that. (2) This then brings into focus the second problem… lack of data analysis. In Chapter 4, you provided an analysis of the data results. In Chapter 5, you now have to take those results from Chapter 4 and show how they relate to the Problem Statement and Research Questions, and then how that data justifies the Conclusions you are making. Chapter 5 is the most important chapter because it ties-in everything that your study is trying to say. At less than 2,000 words currently, I can tell you that you’re not even halfway there. You have a significant amount of more writing to do. Last thing… keep your writing sterile and based on facts. Too often you use transition signals and emphasis words to attempt to persuade the reader into agreeing with you, and that is unacceptable. You are to present the facts, and then conclusions based on facts. Nothing else is permitted in a dissertation”

Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!