Explain the difference between an implied-in-law (quasi-contract) and an implied-in-fact contract.

Write an 800- to 1,200-word paper using Microsoft® Word. Address the following questions: • What type of intellectual property was at issue in this case? Were these ideas entitled to protection under the law? • Explain the difference between an implied-in-law (quasi-contract) and an implied-in-fact contract. What type of contract was at issue in this case? • Explain what the parties could have done differently to protect their rights and avoid this dispute. • Explain how a properly written contract could have been utilized for the licensing and use of the intellectual property to prevent the issue, and provide terms you would recommend be included in such a contract. • Identify and explain each of the elements that would have been necessary to form a valid contract