Emotion Differentiation and Emotion Regulation in High and Low Socially Anxious Individuals
Emotion Differentiation and Emotion Regulation in High and Low Socially Anxious Individuals: 1An Experience Sampling Study(2014), Mia Skytte O’Toole, Morten Berg JensenHanne Nørr FentzRobert ZachariaeEsben Hougaard
Critical review: The article mentioned above has to be written by evaluating critically. The instructions below has to be followed. Using past tense by evaluating critically is an obligation. The strenght and the limitation of the article also has to be written. The number of the participants, method, procedure and measures used in the study are also essential. A detailed review of recent research paper, including an account of participants, methods, key findings etc. Each paper should be critically evaluated, meaning that you should discuss both the limitiations and strengths of the paper themselves, and also how the compare to other studies. As part of this section you should describe the search process by which you identified these articles (before you start discussing them). This should include a list of the databases and the search terms that you used. This should be detailed enough to allow someone else to recreate your search if necessary. – Overall, make sure you write in the past tense when discussing research study. – The biggest parts are summaries of the paper, and the critical evaluations are very short. Of course we need information about the study, but this could be shorter and clearer. – Make sure that your explanation of the study is clear. What are they aiming to study/analyse? What have they measured? What did they find? Use the same words for the same measures throughout to make it clearer and more consistent. – I would recommend to make the critical review less descriptive and more critical. The critical evaluation could be more detailed and in depth. It is important that you show your own critical evaluation, not just an overview of the authors discussion points. And add details and explanations of why something is a limitation/strength of the study. – Please proofread carefully. English language use could improve. I cannot correct everything in this document, but I have added some corrections to give you an idea.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!