Deconstruct and evaluate negotiation outcomes and processes by applying a multi-disciplinary framework to aid a holistic negotiation debrief.

Please write a 2,500 word case analysis as follows: Develop a case study of a recent negotiation you were involved in, observed as a stakeholder or supporter, or that you have studied from recent events or even from history (provide a short introduction describing the negotiation at the start of your paper). Your paper should then set up an analytical framework or apply a theory that explains some element of negotiation and use that framework to analyse the case. This paper asks you to ‘test’ or apply the framework or theory in what is to be an analytical case analysis. Your paper should build to convincing and well-drawn conclusions about both the framework/theory and the case. Marking Criteria Case study: 10%  Note: If the assignment refers to commercially sensitive negotiations all company and individual names should be anonymised (changed to pseudonyms) to protect anonymity, especially important due to the use of Turnitin software submissions. This Assessment Task relates to the following Learning Outcomes: Diagnose complex negotiation scenarios to determine appropriate negotiation goals, strategies, tactics and behaviours based on an informed assessment of risks and rewards. Apply sophisticated problem-solving and collaboration skills in business and workplace negotiations to enable value creation. Critically reflect on how assumptions, values, cognitive heuristics and cultural bias impact on negotiation sub processes such as decision making, goal setting and evaluating negotiated outcomes. Students will learn how to adapt their own negotiation behaviours when working in international and inter/intra-organisational cultures. Deconstruct and evaluate negotiation outcomes and processes by applying a multi-disciplinary framework to aid a holistic negotiation debrief. Define success in a manner that captures all aspects of value in a negotiation to increase value creation, reduce inequality in distribution of that value, and ultimately ensure greater sustainability of the negotiation process and of outcomes.