Children sex trafficking

  Please use the below information to edit the document and let me know if there are any questions. ***NOTE: You will re-use and improve upon this exact same paper in IP3 in the following sequence: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v6uAvECj1zvmd5kFzBhFu-gj-akH056V/view?usp=sharing Sapphire, this is a good job on identifying a criminal justice topic to study for the remainder of this course. You will use the exact same topic in assignments 3, 4 (a PowerPoint) and 5. Below are recommendations that should be applied to future writings. Keep up the good work. The following has a weak syntax: ” Children sex trafficking is considered to be a criminal act that defiles children social rights in all possible ways. ” And: “The first Is acquisition, movement, and mistreatment of the young children.” And: “Children being forced to prostitution is also another form of sex trafficking.” And: “Children sex trafficking criminal acts are considered one of the largest criminal industries in the entire world.” And: “A lot of bribes is involved among social work professions that the issue remains unsolved for many years.” There are other sentence structure issues that won’t be pointed out here. Some of the weak sentence structures could probably be caught by you if you set your paper down (after you think you’re done with it) and then walk away from it and just leave it overnight. Then, the next day, pick it up and “proof read” it. That simply means that you’re reading it to look for errors in it. Does it sound right when you read it back to yourself? If not, then re-write it until you’re satisfied with it. By doing that, you can catch a lot of your own errors and can increase the flow of the paper. That’s the method that I use – and it might be helpful for you too. (7.5 points). Please consider having a total of 2 or 3 research questions. Please visit the following link to see how to fully develop research questions: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0QmECZPnLPhaW1kWnA0RnBaelE/view?usp=sharing (3 points). The research proposal is missing a hypothesis, although there is an incorrect facsimile of one. Here is the process for writing a hypothesis: (1) First, identify a problem. That is your thesis statement. (2) Second, make an educated guess as to what is causing the problem. Is there a “cause and effect”? (3) Third, create a hypothesis. Here is a sample hypothesis: “If [this is done], then [this will happen].” Here is an oversimplified hypothesis (prediction): “If [a water spigot is turned on], then [water will come out of the facet].” Here is a criminal justice hypothesis (prediction): “If [arrested addicts receive drug rehabilitation], then [they are less likely to be rearrested for drug possession].” Fill in the blanks with the information from your own proposed experiment. Your hypothesis should be something that you can test. It’s called a testable hypothesis. Here is a website that explains it more: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0QmECZPnLPhdU9JWTZDSjNWZms/view?usp=sharing (4.5 point). There is a section titled “measurement and analysis,” but it needs to be more robust to show where you will get your data (information) from. Will you get it from preexisting articles, journals or websites? How will you measure or analyze the information (data) that you collect? Exactly what kind of data will be collected – and how will it be analyzed or measured? Here is a website that explains how to write a “measurement and analysis” section: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZuEPPZGgIj-O7iLqzpUnQar4bZK5GSd1/view?usp=sharing (5 points). The section that is listed as “Ethical Standards” discusses the wrong issues. It should address how the researcher (you) are going to ensure that your research is not a danger to anyone or to the public. For example, do you need approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) before you conduct your research? Please discuss that in your paper. Here is a website that explains ethical considerations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZUt_d_kTBd0C9DraTQUg1g9RMslMHmyZ/view?usp=sharing Here is an example of unethical research that was conducted on humans for over 40 years: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0QmECZPnLPhLWo4UXVfREhRdEk/view?usp=sharing (4.5 points) This project is designed to culminate in the selection of a final topic to be used in the remainder of this course for subsequent assignments in the near future. In searching for a topic, issues in the public sector and the private sector were also considered. The topic selection led to a review of what a thesis statement is to appropriately identify the problem or the issue to be studied. It subsequently included a study of a hypothetical situation (a hypothesis) to determine possible outcomes to proposed theories. Measurements and analysis were also discussed during a literature review, to include applicable resources (also known as as an annotated bibliography). Lastly, ethical standards were reviewed. During the live chat, it was noted that Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission is needed before research can be conducted on humans. In this instance, no IRB approval is required. As a result, the basic ethical concepts were broached.