Arthur Andersen

 provide Recommendations for what Arthur adnersen might have done better ( focus of Arthur Andersen firm, not enron company) here is a describtion for the recommondation part. Describe what the company or industry actually decided to do. Based on your stakeholder analysis, critique what was actually done and provide your own recommendations. Explain how ethical issues are addressed. Give some thought to whether the company’s course of action and your recommendations will be affordable and sustainable going forward. If it was a negative issue consider how this could event have been avoided? How can future events of a similar nature be avoided? Does the organization or industry need to conduct an assessment of its practices to determine which might be lacking from an ethical or CSR standpoint? If so, you should identify which of these specific practices need to be reviewed. If your research was detailed enough you may want to identify who will lead the investigating team and what documents or policies should be reviewed. Consider whether or not the company’s or industry’s reporting structure and organization chart(s) need to be rethought. Possibly, are there new hiring practices that need to be considered to ensure that the wrong type of people don’t get into the organization or industry in the first place. Do any individual companies within the industry need to alert their own lawyers on this matter in case legal action flows from the event in question? Possibly the matter is more high-profile and one or more levels of government need to pass legislation to ensure that nothing of this nature happens again.